Advertisement
Hope this history helps put these discoveries in perspective...
Imagine, for a moment, that you have spent more than two decades in painfully laborious research-- that you have discovered an incredibly simple, electronic approach to curing literally every disease on the planet caused by viruses and bacteria . Indeed, it is a discovery that would end the pain and suffering of countless millions and change life on Earth forever. Certainly, the medical world would rush to embrace you with every imaginable accolade and financial reward imaginable. You would think so, wouldnt you?
Unfortunately, arguably the greatest medical genius in all recorded history suffered a fate literally the opposite of the foregoing logical scenario. In fact, the history of medicine is replete with stories of genius betrayed by backward thought and jealously, but most pathetically, by greed and money.
In the nineteenth century, Semmelweiss struggled mightily to convince surgeons that it was a good idea to sterilize their instruments and use sterile surgical procedures. Pasteur was ridiculed for years for his theory that germs could cause disease.
Scores of other medical visionaries went through hell for simply challenging the medical status quo of day, including such legends as Roentgen and his X-rays, Morton for promoting the 'absurd' idea of anaesthesia, Harvey for his theory of the circulation of blood, and many others in recent decades including: W.F. Koch, Revici, Burzynski, Naessens, Priore, Livingston-Wheeler, and Hoxsey.
Orthodox big-money medicine resents and seeks to neutralize and/or destroy those who challenge its beliefs. Often, the visionary who challenges it pays a heavy price for his 'heresy.'
So, you have just discovered a new therapy which can eradicate any microbial disease but, so far, you and your amazing cure aren't very popular. What do you do next? Well, certainly the research foundations and teaching institutions would welcome news of your astounding discovery. Won't they be thrilled to learn you have a cure for the very same diseases they are receiving hundreds of millions of dollars per year to investigate? Maybe not, if it means the end of the gravy train. These people have mortgages to pay and families to support. On second thought, forget the research foundations.
Perhaps you should take your discovery to the pharmaceutical industry; certainly it would be of great interest to those protectors of humanity, right? But remember, you have developed a universal cure which makes drugs obsolete, so the pharmaceutical industry just might be less than thrilled to hear about your work. In fact, the bigshots might even make it certain that your human disease-ending technology never sees the light of day, by preventing it from becoming licensed by the regulatory agencies.
Now, assuming your amazing cure is an electronic instrument, the only cost of using it is electricity. And it is absolutely harmless to patients, who can recover without losing their hair, the family home, and their life savings. So, with your technology, there is no longer any reason for people with cancer to pay over $300,000 per patient -- to become deathly ill from chemotherapy, radiation treatments, and the mutilation of surgery. It sounds like you won't find many friends and support among practicing oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons, doesnt it?
You might try the hospitals and big clinics. But how thrilled are they going to be about a therapy administered in any doctor's office; which reverses illness before the patient has to be hospitalized? Thanks to you, the staffs of these institutions will essentially be out of work.
Well then, how about the insurance companies? Surely, they would be delighted to save the expense of hospitalization - at least the companies which haven't invested in hospitals, where the staff is now sitting around waiting for someone to break a leg or be in a car accident...and the ones who don't lose policyholders as a result of your invention...and the companies which aren't trying to divest their pharmaceutical stock. Oh well, forget the insurance companies, too.
It looks like you just might have a little problem with the medical establishment, no?
Probably the only friends you'll have will be the patients and those progressive doctors who see change as an opportunity, rather than a threat to their established money-making monopoly. Those people will love you. But they don't call the shots.
What follows, now, is the story of exactly such a sensational therapy and what happened to it. In one of the blackest episodes in recorded history, this remarkable electronic therapy was sabotaged and buried by a ruthless group of men. It has re-emerged in the underground medical/alternative health world only since the mid-80's. This is the story of Royal Raymond Rife and his fabulous discoveries and electronic instruments.
If you have never heard of Rife before, prepare to be angered and incredulous at what this great man achieved for all of us only to have it practically driven from the face of the planet. But, reserve your final judgement and decision until after you have read this.
Of course, some may regard this as just an amusing piece of fiction. However, for those who are willing to do some investigating on their own, there will be mentioned several highly-respected doctors and medical authorities who worked with Rife as well as some of the remarkable technical aspects of his creation.
However, in the final analysis, the only real way to determine if such a revolutionary therapy exists is to experience it yourself. The medical literature is full of rigged 'double-blind' clinical research tests, the results of which are often determined in advance by the vested corporate interests involved.
If FDA and other regulatory and licensing procedures and guidelines are observed, it is your privilege to experiment with this harmless therapy. So let's now turn to the story of the most amazing medical pioneer of our century.
Royal Raymond Rife was a brilliant scientist born in 1888 and died in 1971. After studying at Johns Hopkins, Rife developed technology which is still commonly used today in the fields of optics, electronics, radiochemistry, biochemistry, ballistics, and aviation. It is a fair statement that Rife practically developed bioelectric medicine himself.
He received 14 major awards and honors and was given an honorary Doctorate by the University of Heidelberg for his work. During the 66 years that Rife spent designing and building medical instruments, he worked for Zeiss Optics, the U.S. Government, and several private benefactors. Most notable was millionaire Henry Timkin, of Timkin roller bearing fame.
Because Rife was self-educated in so many different fields, he intuitively looked for his answers in areas beyond the rigid scientific structure of his day. He had mastered so many different disciplines that he literally had, at his intellectual disposal, the skills and knowledge of an entire team of scientists and technicians from a number of different scientific fields. So, whenever new technology was needed to perform a new task, Rife simply invented and then built it himself.
Rife's inventions include a heterodyning ultraviolet microscope, a microdissector, and a micromanipulator. When you thoroughly understand Rife's achievements, you may well decide that he has the most gifted, versatile, scientific mind in human history.
By 1920, Rife had finished building the world's first virus microscope. By 1933, he had perfected that technology and had constructed the incredibly complex Universal Microscope, which had nearly 6,000 different parts and was capable of magnifying objects 60,000 times their normal size. With this incredible microscope, Rife became the first human being to actually see a live virus, and until quite recently, the Universal Microscope was the only one which was able view live viruses.
Modern electron microscopes instantly kill everything beneath them, viewing only the mummified remains and debris. What the Rife microscope can see is the bustling activity of living viruses as they change form to accommodate changes in environment, replicate rapidly in response to carcinogens, and transform normal cells into tumor cells.
But how was Rife able to accomplish this, in an age when electronics and medicine were still just evolving? Here are a few technical details to placate the skeptics...
Rife painstakingly identified the individual spectroscopic signature of each microbe, using a slit spectroscope attachment. Then, he slowly rotated block quartz prisms to focus light of a single wavelength upon the microorganism he was examining. This wavelength was selected because it resonated with the spectroscopic signature frequency of the microbe based on the now-established fact that every molecule oscillates at its own distinct frequency.
The atoms that come together to form a molecule are held together in that molecular configuration with a covalent energy bond which both emits and absorbs its own specific electromagnetic frequency. No two species of molecule have the same electromagnetic oscillations or energetic signature. Resonance amplifies light in the same way two ocean waves intensify each other when they merge together.
The result of using a resonant wavelength is that micro-organisms which are invisible in white light suddenly become visible in a brilliant flash of light when they are exposed to the color frequency that resonates with their own distinct spectroscopic signature. Rife was thus able to see these otherwise invisible organisms and watch them actively invading tissues cultures. Rife's discovery enabled him to view organisms that no one else could see with ordinary microscopes.
More than 75% of the organisms Rife could see with his Universal Microscope are only visible with ultra-violet light. But ultraviolet light is outside the range of human vision, it is 'invisible' to us. Rife's brilliance allowed him to overcome this limitation by heterodyning, a technique which became popular in early radio broadcasting. He illuminated the microbe (usually a virus or bacteria) with two different wavelengths of the same ultraviolet light frequency which resonated with the spectral signature of the microbe. These two wavelengths produced interference where they merged. This interference was, in effect, a third, longer wave which fell into the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. This was how Rife made invisible microbes visible without killing them, a feat which today's electron microscopes cannot duplicate.
By this time, Rife was so far ahead of his colleagues of the 1930's(!), that they could not comprehend what he was doing without actually traveling to San Diego to Rife's laboratory to look through his Virus Microscope for themselves. And many did exactly that.
One was Virginia Livingston. She eventually moved from New Jersey to Rife's Point Loma (San Diego) neighborhood and became a frequent visitor to his lab. Virginia Livingston is now often given the credit for identifying the organism which causes human cancer, beginning with research papers she began publishing in 1948.
In reality, Royal Rife had identified the human cancer virus first...in 1920! Rife then made over 20,000 unsuccessful attempts to transform normal cells into tumor cells. He finally succeeded when he irradiated the cancer virus, passed it through a cell-catching ultra-fine porcelain filter, and injected it into lab animals. Not content to prove this virus would cause one tumor, Rife then created 400 tumors in succession from the same culture. He documented everything with film, photographs, and meticulous records. He named the cancer virus 'Cryptocides primordiales.'
Virginia Livingston, in her papers, renamed it Progenitor Cryptocides. Royal Rife was never even mentioned in her papers. In fact, Rife seldom got credit for his monumental discoveries. He was a quiet, unassuming scientist, dedicated to expanding his discoveries rather than to ambition, fame, and glory. His distaste for medical politics (which he could afford to ignore thanks to generous trusts set up by private benefactors) left him at a disadvantage later, when powerful forces attacked him. Coupled with the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in purging his papers from medical journals, it is hardly surprising that few heave heard of Rife today.
Meanwhile, debate raged between those who had seen viruses changing into different forms beneath Rife's microscopes, and those who had not. Those who condemned without investigation, such as the influential Dr. Thomas Rivers, claimed these forms didn't exist.
Because his microscope did not reveal them, Rivers argued that there was "no logical basis for belief in this theory." The same argument is used today in evaluating many other 'alternative' medical treatments; if there is no precedent, then it must not be valid. Nothing can convince a closed mind. Most had never actually looked though the San Diego microscopes...air travel in the 1930's was uncomfortable, primitive, and rather risky. So, the debate about the life cycle of viruses was resolved in favor of those who never saw it (even modern electron microscopes show frozen images, not the life cycle of viruses in process).
Nevertheless, many scientists and doctors have since confirmed Rife's discovery of the cancer virus and its pleomorphic nature, using darkfield techniques, the Naessens microscope, and laboratory experiments. Rife also worked with the top scientists and doctors of his day who also confirmed or endorsed various areas of his work. They included: E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (longtime Chief of Bacteriology, Mayo Clinic); Arthur Kendall (Director, Northwestern Medical School); Dr. George Dock (internationally-renowned); Alvin Foord (famous pathologist); Rufus Klein-Schmidt (President of USC); R.T. Hamer (Superintendent, Paradise Valley Sanitarium; Dr. Milbank Johnson (Director of the Southern California AMA); Whalen Morrison (Chief Surgeon, Santa Fe Railway); George Fischer (Childrens Hospital, N.Y.); Edward Kopps (Metabolic Clinic, La Jolla); Karl Meyer (Hooper Foundation, S.F.); M. Zite (Chicago University); and many others.
Rife ignored the debate, preferring to concentrate on refining his method of destroying these tiny killer viruses. He used the same principle to kill them, which made them visible: resonance.
By increasing the intensity of a frequency which resonated naturally with these microbes, Rife increased their natural oscillations until they distorted and disintegrated from structural stresses. Rife called this frequency 'the mortal oscillatory rate,' or 'MOR', and it did no harm whatsoever to the surrounding tissues.
Today's Rife instruments use harmonics of the frequencies shown on the display screen. The wavelength of the actual frequency shown (770hz, 880hz, etc.) is too long to do the job.
This principle can be illustrated by using an intense musical note to shatter a wine glass: the molecules of the glass are already oscillating at some harmonic (multiple) of that musical note; they are in resonance with it. Because everything else has a different resonant frequency, nothing but the glass is destroyed. There are literally hundreds of trillions of different resonant frequencies, and every species and molecule has its very own.
It took Rife many years, working 48 hours at a time, until he discovered the frequencies which specifically destroyed herpes, polio, spinal meningitis, tetanus, influenza, and an immense number of other dangerous disease organisms.
In 1934, the University of Southern California appointed a Special Medical Research Committee to bring terminal cancer patients from Pasadena County Hospital to Rife's San Diego Laboratory and clinic for treatment. The team included doctors and pathologists assigned to examine the patients - if still alive - in 90 days.
After the 90 days of treatment, the Committee concluded that 86.5% of the patients had been completely cured. The treatment was then adjusted and the remaining 13.5% of the patients also responded within the next four weeks. The total recovery rate using Rife's technology was 100%.
On November 20, 1931, forty-four of the nation's most respected medical authorities honored Royal Rife with a banquet billed as The End To All Diseases at the Pasadena estate of Dr. Milbank Johnson.
But by 1939, almost all of these distinguished doctors and scientists were denying that they had ever met Rife. What happened to make so many brilliant men have complete memory lapses? It seems that news of Rife's miracles with terminal patients had reached other ears. Remember our hypothetical question at the beginning of this report: What would happen if you discovered a cure for everything? You are now about to find out....
At first, a token attempt was made to buy out Rife. Morris Fishbein, who had acquired the entire stock of the American Medical Association by 1934, sent an attorney to Rife with 'an offer you can't refuse.' Rife refused. We many never know the exact terms of this offer. But we do know the terms of the offer Fishbein made to Harry Hoxsey for control of his herbal cancer remedy. Fishbein's associates would receive all profits for nine years and Hoxey would receive nothing. Then, if they were satisfied that it worked, Hoxsey would begin to receive 10% of the profits. Hoxsey decided that he would rather continue to make all the profits himself. When Hoxsey turned Fishbein down, Fishbein used his immensely powerful political connections to have Hoxsey arrested 125 times in a period of 16 months. The charges (based on practice without a license) were always thrown out of court, but the harassment drove Hoxsey insane.
But Fishbein must have realized that this strategy would backfire with Rife. First, Rife could not be arrested like Hoxsey for practising without a license. A trial on trumped-up charges would mean that testimony supporting Rife would be introduced by prominent medical authorities working with Rife. And the defense would undoubtedly take the opportunity to introduce evidence such as the 1934 medical study done with USC. The last thing in the world that the pharmaceutical industry wanted was a public trial about a painless therapy that cured 100% of the terminal cancer patients and cost nothing to use but a little electricity. It might give people the idea that they didn't need drugs.
And finally, Rife had spent decades accumulating meticulous evidence of his work, including film and stop-motion photographs. No, different tactics were needed...
The first incident was the gradual pilfering of components, photographs, film, and written records from Rife's lab. The culprit was never caught.
Then, while Rife struggled to reproduce his missing data (in a day when photocopies and computers were not available), someone vandalized his precious virus microscopes. Pieces of the 5,682 piece Universal microscope were stolen. Earlier, an arson fire had destroyed the multi-million dollar Burnett Lab in New Jersey, just as the scientists there were preparing to announce confirmation of Rife's work. But the final blow came later, when police illegally confiscated the remainder of Rife's 50 years of research.
Then in 1939, agents of a family which controlled the drug industry assisted Philip Hoyland in a frivolous lawsuit against his own partners in the Beam Ray Corporation. This was the only company manufacturing Rife's frequency instruments (Rife was not a partner). Hoyland lost, but his assisted legal assault had the desired effect: the company was bankrupted by legal expenses. And during the Great Depression, this meant that commercial production of Rife's frequency instruments ceased completely.
And remember what a universal cure meant to hospitals and research foundations? Doctors who tried to defend Rife lost their foundations grants and hospital privileges.
On the other hand, big money was spent ensuring that doctors who had seen Rife's therapy would forget what they saw. Almost no price was too much to suppress it. Remember that, today, treatment of a single cancer patient averages over $300,000. It's BIG business.
Thus, Arthur Kendall, the Director of the Northwestern School of Medicine who worked with Rife on the cancer virus, accepted almost a quarter of a million dollars to suddenly 'retire' in Mexico. That was an exorbitant amount of money in the Depression.
Dr. George Dock, another prominent figure who collaborated with Rife, was silenced with an enormous grant, along with the highest honors the AMA could bestow. Between the carrots and the sticks, everyone except Dr. Couche and Dr. Milbank Johnson gave up Rife's work and went back to prescribing drugs.
To finish the job, the medical journals, support almost entirely by drug company revenues and controlled by the AMA, refused to publish any paper by anyone on Rife's therapy. Therefore, an entire generation of medical students graduated into practice without ever once hearing of Rife's breakthroughs in medicine.
The magnitude of such an insane crime eclipses every mass murder in history. Cancer picks us off quietly...but by 1960 the casualties from this tiny virus exceeded the carnage of all the wars America ever fought. In 1989, it was estimated that 40% of us will experience cancer at some time in our lives.
In Rife's lifetime, he had witnessed the progress of civilization from horse-and-buggy travel to jet planes. In that same time, he saw the epidemic of cancer increase from 1 in 24 Americans in 1905 to 1 in 3 in 1971 when Rife died.
He also witnessed the phenomenal growth of the American Cancer Society, the Salk Foundation, and many others collecting hundreds of millions of dollars for diseases that were cured long before in his own San Diego laboratories. In one period, 176,500 cancer drugs were submitted for approval. Any that showed 'favorable' results in only one-sixth of one percent of the cases being studied could be licensed. Some of these drugs had a mortality rate of 14-17%. When death came from the drug, not the cancer, the case was recorded as a 'complete' or 'partial remission' because the patient didn't actually die from the cancer. In reality, it was a race to see which would kill the patient first: the drug or the disease.
The inevitable conclusion reached by Rife was that his life-long labor and discoveries had not only been ignored but probably would be buried with him. At that point, he ceased to produce much of anything and spent the last third of his life seeking oblivion in alcohol. It dulled the pain and his acute awareness of half a century of wasted effort - ignored - while the unnecessary suffering of millions continued so that a vested few might profit. And profit they did, and profit they do.
In 1971, Royal Rife died from a combination of valium and alcohol at the age of 83. Perhaps his continual exposure to his own Rife frequencies helped his body endure abuse for so many years.
Fortunately, his death was not the end of his electronic therapy. A few humanitarian doctors and engineers reconstructed his frequency instruments and kept his genius alive. Rife technology became public knowledge again in 1986 with the publication of The Cancer Cure That Worked, by Barry Lynes, and other material about Royal Rife and his monumental work.
There is wide variation in the cost, design, and quality of the modern portable Rife frequency research instruments available. Costs vary from about $1200 to $3600 with price being no legitimate indicator of the technical competence in the design of the instrument or performance of the instruent. Some of the most expensive units have serious technical limitations and are essentially a waste of money. At the other extreme, some researchers do get crude results from inexpensive simple, unmodified frequency generators, but this is just as misguided as spending too much money. Without the proper modifications, the basic frequency generator gives only minimal and inconsistent results. Please recall that the actual destruction of the viruses and bacteria, etc. is not accomplished by the frequency displayed on these cheap generators, but by certain shorter harmonics of that particular frequency which are often blocked by the crudity of a cheap and rudimentary instrument itself.
This very problem led Rife to ultimately abandon the 'ray tube' design in favor of today's version. The newer technology applies the frequencies and their harmonics to the body through the use of hand-held, footplate, or stick-on electrodes. Proper frequency exposure and flushing of the body with large amounts of clean, pure water is critical to achieve the kind of results Rife got. These procedures are fully explained in the manuals of the best units on the market.
So, unless you would be satisfied with sporadic results for minor conditions, it is suggested you use only the highest quality equipment and only the proper, proven procedures in your personal research. If you do, you may discover that nothing can approach what can be achieved through the application of these safe, time-tested frequencies (many for over 65 years)- and all without drugs, surgery, or radiation.
One day, the name of Royal Raymond Rife may ascend to its rightful place as the giant of modern medical science. Until that time, his fabulous technology remains available only to the people who have the interest to seek it out. While perfectly legal for veterinarians to use to save the lives of animals, Rife's brilliant frequency therapy remains taboo to orthodox mainstream medicine because of the continuing threat it poses to the international pharmaceutical medical monopoly that controls the lives - and deaths - of the vast majority of the people on this planet.
posted by:
|
California
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: The Rife Story
Tue, March 29, 2005 - 12:07 PMCheck this history...
Morris Fishbein - AMA Enemy
Of American Health
By Bob Wallace LewRockwell.com
2-5-2
Dr. Morris Fishbein (1889-1976) originally studied to be a clown. Realizing he could make more money as a doctor, he entered medical school (where he failed anatomy), then barely graduated. He never treated a patient in his life.
Why is he so important? Because he became head of the AMA, a position that he used to enrich himself and crush legitimate therapies out of existence. He appeared to be motivated solely by money and power.
As head of the AMA (and editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association from 1924-1949), he decided which drugs could be sold to the public based only how much advertising money he could extort from drug manufacturers, whom he required to place expensive ads in the JAMA. There were no drug-testing agencies, only Fishbein. It was irrelevant if the drugs worked.
Fishbein was a shakedown artist. Yet, today, there is a Morris Fishbein Center for the History of Science and Medicine at the University of Chicago.
The AMA, a State-backed guild which today has a near-stranglehold on the medical profession, was founded in 1847 merely as a social and scientific organization. Its original purpose was totally appropriate. It was in their private (and the public's) interest for practitioners to get together to trade knowledge, and, for all the outward seriousness of the organization, to have some fun. The original purpose always seems to get lost, though. Some members always want to use the State to reduce the supply of practitioners (which increases income) and eliminate competition (which also increases income, and, much more seriously, reduces innovation). This happened with he AMA, which is why it is now a danger to the health of the American people.
In 1900, while attending the annual AMA convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, three doctors came up with the always-destructive but all-too-human idea of using the AMA as a front, in order to form a closed corporation for their financial benefit. A constitution, bylaws and a charter were created which appeared to give the members of the AMA a say in the activities of the corporation, whereas in reality the three directors had complete control. These three formed smaller political machines in every state, which they controlled through the main corporation.
In 1924, not surprisingly (perhaps inevitably) one of the directors became involved in a scandal and had to resign. He appointed Fishbein to take his place. Fishbein ultimately took control of the AMA, and by 1934 owned all of the stock. In his new position he was able to assume dictatorial control of the state licensing boards and made it as difficult as he could for any doctor who did not join. He, and the three doctors who formed the corporation, were little more than extortionists, ones who made millions by using the power of the State.
The AMA, which started out as a legitimate organization, rapidly became crooked. And Fishbein was the main cause.
The worst of Fishbein's sins was his destruction of Royal Rife. Royal Raymond Rife
I don't know if Royal Raymond Rife was legitimate or not. I believe the evidence leans towards his being a once-in-a-century genius.
He was born in 1888 in Elkhorn, Nebraska, and died in 1971, at age 83. He grew up with a passion for microscopes, microbiology, and electronics.
He was brilliant. There can be no doubt about that. He invented technology still used today in optics, electronics, radiochemistry, biochemistry, ballistics, and aviation. Some of his many inventions included a heterodyning ultraviolet microscope, a microdissector, and a micromanipulator. He studied at John Hopkins, received 14 major awards, and was honored with an honorary doctorate from the University of Heidelberg. He worked for Zeiss Optics, the US government, and several private employers, the most notable of them being Henry Timkin, who made millions manufacturing roller bearings.
Most people have never heard of Rife.
By 1920, Rife had built the world's first microscope that was strong enough for the him to see a virus (he sometimes had to painfully adjust his microscope for up to 24 hours to get the specimen into focus). By 1932, after 12 years and five microscopes, he perfected his technology and had constructed the largest and most powerful of them, which he called his "Universal Microscope." It had almost 6,000 different parts and could magnify objects 61,000 times their normal size. With this two-foot-tall, 200-pound microscope, Rife became the first to see a live virus, and until recently, his microscope was the only one which could do this.
Modern electron microscopes, although more powerful than Rife's invention, instantly kill the viruses they are focused upon. Rife's microscope left the viruses alive, so they could be studied.
Rife's genius was first introduced to the public in the San Diego Union newspaper in 1929, and was followed by an article in Popular Science in 1931. Articles describing his great scientific breakthroughs appeared in the established scientific press in for the first time in late 1931 in Science magazine, as well as California and Western Medicine.
In 1944, the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, DC, published a detailed article about Rife in their national journal, with his microscope the focus of it. But what was revealed to their readers was not only Rife's microscope, but how he was able to destroy disease-causing pathogens.
As far back as 1920, Rife had identified a virus that he believed caused cancer. He called it the "BX virus." He made over 20,000 unsuccessful attempts to transform normal cells into tumor cells. He failed until he irradiated the virus, caught it in a porcelain filter, and injected in into lab animals. Using this technique, he created 400 tumors in a row.
He began subjecting this virus to different radio frequencies to see if it was affected by them. He discovered what he called the "Mortal Oscillatory Rate" (MOR) of the virus. He successfully cured cancer in his 400 experimental animals before he decided to run tests on humans.
What Rife was doing was using resonance to kill the virus. Everything vibrates at different frequencies. If the resonance is correct, it can be used to shatter, just as a singer can use it to break a wineglass. By finding the proper resonance, Rife was able to shatter the virus. This is why he called it the Mortal Oscillatory Rate.
Rife claims he also discovered the frequencies which destroyed herpes, polio, spinal meningitis, tetanus, influenza, and many other dangerous, disease-causing organisms. All told, there were over 50 infectious diseases that he apparently discovered cures for.
How did Rife do this? He painstakingly obtained the MORS by tuning the dial of the frequency generator while observing the sample pathogen under his microscope. When a frequency was discovered that destroyed a particular microorganism, its dial position was marked. The actual frequencies were determined later after his experiments. What he did, he apparently did intuitively and unwittingly, and it is doubtful he completely understood the theoretical method he utilized. For one thing, there was at that time no theory to explain what he was doing. (In doing research for this article, I have come to the conclusion that Rife was so far advanced over currently available theories that he could not explain what he was doing.)
In the summer of 1934, one of Rife's close friends, Dr. Milbank Johnson, along with the University of Southern California, appointed a Special Medical Research Committee to bring 16 terminally cancer patients from Pasadena County Hospital to Rife's San Diego Laboratory and clinic for treatment. The team included doctors and pathologists assigned to examine the patients - if they were still alive - after 90 days.
Some of the other scientists and doctors Rife worked with were: E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (longtime Chief of Bacteriology, Mayo Clinic); Arthur Kendall (Director, Northwestern Medical School); Dr. George Dock; Alvin Foord (pathologist); Rufus Klein-Schmidt (President of USC); R.T. Hamer (Superintendent, Paradise Valley Sanitarium); Whalen Morrison (Chief Surgeon, Santa Fe Railway); George Fischer (Childrens Hospital, N.Y.); Edward Kopps (Metabolic Clinic, La Jolla); Karl Meyer (Hooper Foundation, S.F.); and M. Zite (Chicago University).
At first, the patients were given three minutes of the appropriate frequency every day. The treatment consisted of the patients standing next to one of Rife's generators, which irradiated them. It was much the same as standing in front of a large fluorescent light. The researchers soon learned this was too much of the treatment. Suspecting the human body needed more time to dispose of the dead toxins, they reduced the time to three minutes every third day.
After the 90 days of treatment, the committee concluded that 14 of the patients had been completely cured. After the treatment was adjusted, the remaining two of the patients responded within the next four weeks. The total recovery rate using Rife's technology was 100%. The treatment was painless, and the side effects, minimal, if any. Except for building the generators, the total cost was a little electricity (today, the cost of treating a cancer patient averages $300,000 were person. That's a lot of money, and the cancer industry is big business.)
Rife wrote in 1953, "Sixteen cases were treated at the clinic for many types of malignancy. After three months, 14 of these so-called hopeless cases were signed off as clinically cured by the staff of five medical doctors and Dr. Alvin G. Foord, M.D., pathologist for the group."
In 1937 Rife and some colleagues established a company called Beam Ray. They manufactured fourteen of Rife's "frequency instruments." Dr. James Couche, who was present at the clinic, used one of Rife's machines with great success for 22 years, long after the AMA had banned it.
Then, to Rife's, and the nation's great misfortune, Fishbein heard about Rife's frequency machine.
Fishbein sent an attorney to make a token attempt to buy out Rife. Rife refused. Although no one knows the exact terms of the offer, it was probably similar to the one Fishbein made to Harry Hoxsey for his herbal cancer remedy (which Fishbein, in court, had to admit worked on skin cancer):
Fishbein and his associates would receive all profits for nine years and Hoxey would receive nothing. Then, if they were satisfied that it worked, Hoxsey would begin to receive 10% of the profits. When Hoxsey refused, Fishbein used his political connections to have Hoxsey arrested 125 times in a period of 16 months. The charges (based on practicing without a license) were always thrown out of court, but Fishbein harassed Hoxsey for 25 years. The only good thing that came out of it is that the scandal forced Fishbein to resign.
Fishbein then offered Phil Hoyland, an investor in Beam Ray and an electrical engineer who had helped build the frequency instruments, legal assistance in an attempt to steal the company from Rife and the other investors. A lawsuit ensued.
The trial of 1939 put an end to the proper scientific investigation of Rife's frequency machine. Rife, who was not as resilient as Hoxsey, became unglued. Unable to cope with the savage and unfair attacks in court, he crumbled, turned to alcohol, and became an alcoholic. This, even though he won the case. Unfortunately, the legal bills bankrupted Beam Ray, and it closed down. Fishbein used his power within the AMA to halt any further investigation of Rife's work.
In 1950 Rife joined up with John Crane, who was an electrical engineer. They worked together for ten years, building more advanced frequency machines. But in 1960 the AMA closed them down. Crane was imprisoned for three years and one month, even though fourteen patients testified as to the effectiveness of the machine (the forewoman of the jury was an AMA doctor). Rife died in 1971, from a combination of alcohol and Valium. He had spend the last one-third of his life as an alcoholic.
What happened to all of those who had supported Rife? By 1939 most of them were denying they ever knew him, even though 44 of them had honored Rife on November 20, 1931 with a banquet billed as "The End to All Diseases" at Dr. Milbank's Pasadena estate.
Arthur Kendall, who worked with Rife on the cancer virus, accepted almost a quarter of a million dollars to suddenly "retire" in Mexico. This was a huge amount of money during the Depression. Dr. George Dock was silenced with an enormous grant, along with the highest honors the AMA could bestow. Everyone except Dr. Couche and Dr. Milbank Johnson gave up Rife's work and went back to prescribing drugs. Johnson died in 1944.
The medical journals, supported almost entirely by drug company advertising revenues and controlled by the AMA, refused to publish any paper by anyone on Rife's therapy. Generations of medical students graduated without hearing of Rife's breakthroughs in medicine.
And what happened to Rife's decades of meticulous evidence of his work, including film and stop-motion photographs? Parts of his instruments, photographs, film, and written records were stolen from his lab. No one knows who was behind it. No one was never caught.
Rife's documentation for the cancer clinic was lost when he lent them to Dr. Arthur Yale a few years later. Barry Lynes, who reintroduced Rife's work to the public in 1986, in his book The Cancer Cure that Worked, wrote, "Documents show the clinic existed and succeeded in curing cancer. And doctors who continued treating seriously ill people with success because of what the frequency instrument accomplished in 1934 tell the real story, as do signed reports from cured cancer patients in later years."
While Rife attempted to reproduce his missing data, his virus microscopes were vandalized. Pieces of his Universal Microscope were stolen. Earlier, arson had destroyed the multi-million dollar Burnett Lab in New Jersey, just as the scientists there were preparing to announce confirmation of Rife's work. But the last blow came later, when police illegally confiscated the remainder of Rife's 50 years of research.
Fortunately, his death was not the end of his electronic therapy. A few humanitarian doctors and engineers attempted to reconstruct his frequency machines and keep his work alive.
But do these modern machines work? I don't know. Modern reseachers are trying to replicate the life's work of what may been one of the greatest geniuses in history.
If you'll look at the reviews of Lynes' book at Amazon.com., there are people who swear by Rife's machines. A doctor I know (who lives outside the US and wishes to remain anonymous) told me, "I have a feeling the Rife machines that are now available to us do not have the correct frequencies...the machines I've experienced have limited settings and transmit a general range of frequencies." But she uses something similar, specifically the LISTEN and the much more advanced BEST machines, invented by James Clark.
She told me several of her case histories, one of which I will reproduce here: "[I was treating] a nine-weeks-old baby that was blue and dying...doctors couldn't find anything wrong with her. I found Ross River fever (mosquito transmitted) and the baby began to respond within two hours of giving her the frequencies, and went on to make a full recovery, just after one treatment. The parents did demand a blood test for the baby to confirm the Ross River virus - which it was! There was nothing the doctors could have done about it. I used to think that somehow the electromagnetic frequency gave the body the right information to deal with the virus. We now know how this works - due to Sharry Edwards, (another practitioner in the States I've studied with, who uses low-frequency sound for healing). She has access to great lab equipment, and last year applied the frequencies representing various parasite, bacteria and viruses to blood containing these pathogens. Under a special high-powered microscope, she observed that the frequency shattered the "mask" - the protein DNA that the pathogen would cloak itself with - and expose the invader to the immune system, would would immediately attack and destroy."
This is essentially what Rife discovered over 80 years ago. We are 80 years behind where we should be, because of one despicable man, Morris Fishbein, who used the State to halt the advance of medicine, and to line his own pockets.
The LISTEN and BEST machines are legal in the US...but not totally. Said this doctor:
"Practitioners in the States do not use the 'imprinting' facility of the machines - that is, broadcasting the frequency. Since this broadcasting is not permitted by your laws, the device is added to the machine when we buy them."
In other words, it is illegal in the US to use the machines to attempt to cure disease. The proper parts aren't even on the machine. It's illegal for a doctor to even suggest such a cure is possible.
There are other instruments (and other inventors) who, past and present, have discovered the same thing Rife did. Gaston Naessons, Hulda Clark and Antoine Priore have invented similar instruments. All suffered persecution at the hands of the State. Are they legitimate? All I can say is that they had an enormous amount of support from their patients.
What would have happened if Rife had suceeded, and Fishbein had failed? If what Rife was doing actually worked, there would be a lot of people who would have not died of cancer. A lot of the medical profession would have ceased to exist. It certainly didn't take a doctor to operate Rife's machines.
Scientists and researches could have devoted more time and money to things we are far behind on, like growing organs and limbs. The hundreds of billions of dollars that has flowed to the unholy alliance of the AMA, FDA, drug industry and the State, would have never been.
The cure for these problems? Remove the State backing from the AMA and FDA, and unleash the power and creatively of the free market. Many people have been brainwashed into thinking the State protects them. The truth is the exact opposite.
Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com
-
-
Re: The Rife Story
Tue, March 29, 2005 - 12:52 PMHomeopathic Rife?
Rife Breakthrough -
Hepatitis Zapped
By Ken Welch
ken_welch@bigfoot.com
8-31-99
On August 19th the New England Journal of Medicine carried an article warning that 2.7 million Americans now carry the Hepatitis-C virus, according to statistics from the CDC. This would make Hepatitis, a potentially fatal disease, the most common blood-borne infection in the country. Globally, the World Health Organization has reported that almost half the world's population carries one or more of the various hepatitis virus, and fatalities are greater than for HIV.
On the same day the article appeared, the first American patient began treatment at an experimental clinic in Georgia, where a multidisciplinary team is attempting to reproduce a 96% Hepatitis cure rate claimed for a Russian trial program last year. The most astounding feature of the Russian treatment is that it used neither drugs nor surgery. A combination of two techniques from beyond the medical meanstream, and often soundly condemned by it, are reported to have removed all traces of the virus in as short a time as three weeks. These results are in the published proceedings of the 1999 Scientific and Technical Conference, an annual event in Moscow, sponsored by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The word from Georgia insiders is that lab results on the first batch of patients are pretty exciting, although astounding might be a better word, given the mode of treatment. Patients receive only an IV drip of - believe it or not - the same standard saline solution used in hospitals around the world. The difference is that this IV solution carries a special charge or resonance, in a surprise blending of Homeopathy and the pioneering research of Royal Raymond Rife. Rife demonstrated the destruction of disease organisms by broadcasting energy at specific frequencies. Today, a new twist takes his work another step forward.
Researchers around the world, including ordinary people fascinated with the concept, are currently working with various devices based on Rife's work. The Web is a rich resource for information about what is available. Any search engine can point you towared the "Rife Ring", a collection of sites devoted to this area. Rife used a form of broadcast energy, created in a neon-like florescent tube, to apply frequencies to person's whole body. His premise was that the right frequency could cause the death of a specific target organism, and thus eliminate a particular disease. He arrived at this by actually observing the destruction of viruses in a unique microscope he invented using the same broadcast energy concepts.
With his microscope, Rife had the advantage of being able to tune his device and confirm the correct frequency simply by observing the result. Researchers following him have not been so fortunate, and often seem to arrive at specific frequencies in a hit or miss patchwork of guesses and unexpected results. Lists containing hundreds of frequencies and their possible results are freely available, but so far there are few really solid, provable associations between a specific frequency and a specific problem. To add to the confusion, many Rife experimenters are attempting to broaden the concept. Frequencies are suggested for the promotion of good health for various organs, an idea completely unrelated to the basic theory of Rife's work.
In the midst of this confusion, the Russian team apparently combined several technologies to create a scientific breakthrough. While the devices and technology are protected by patent and the subject of considerable secrecy, it is apparent that several problems have been solved. These involve the selection of what specific frequency or resonance will be effective, and the method of "charging" water molecules with that energy to create a viable delivery system.
While diagnosis is still dependent on traditional lab work, and patients applying to the Georgia clinic are expected to forward a liver scan from their own physician and lab, computerized instrumentation is being used to confirm that the selected frequency is correct before treatment begins. In other words, technicians can measure the response of a particular person to a particular frequency. While no details are offered so far, this technology has the potential to turn Rife-based frequency work into a very practical and useable medical treatment overnight.
The existence of this technology might have remained secret, but apparently the device is being used to check the original treatment plan against American patients who present a slightly different clinical picture than the original Russian subjects. Due to better health care in the U.S., hepatitis patients live longer. They may appear as "chronic" rather than "acute", which may mean more organs are involved. Apparently, the device used at the clinic can measure the response of a particular organ to a particular frequency in only minutes, eliminating a lot of trial and error experimentation.
The second breakthrough is in the delivery system, both in theory and in practice. The Russians see their frequency selection as an opposite or "canceling" frequency, rather than the more direct, "destructive" frequency which Rife observed when microorganisms glowed and shattered in the field of his microscope. While it may not be possible to prove exactly what the mechanism really is, the Russian theory is that an invading virus (and perhaps other problems as well) has a certain frequency, and that by bathing this pathogen in something carrying an "opposite" frequency the result is a zero sum: the organism's energy is neutralized and the virus dies.
This is somewhat like the physicists who had to come up with a theoretical structure for the atom without being able to see one. Only time will tell what is really happening. Of course the results of treatment must be verified by lab work, and the clinic is very firm that success of their hepatitis program is dependent on the disappearance of the "markers" for the virus in an independent lab report.
The choice of water and a homeopathic system, as opposed to direct frequency exposure via a Rife tube, is fascinating. Homeopathy, a highly respected school of medicine around the world, is totally dependent on the concept that water molecules can carry "information" or "charge" left over from some other substance that has been so greatly diluted that for all practical purposes it is no longer there at all. Apparently it is also possible to induce the desired frequency or resonance at a molecular level through electronicor other means. This is the physical key to the delivery system and apparently a Russian device or machine is used to do the charging.
There are many unanswered questions here which will probably be resolved in time. The real story, over and above what may be a terrific treatment for hepatitis, is the technology itself. Working with "frequencies" may turn out to be the medicine of the new millenium. If lab reports can show dramatic improvements when the only thing administered was hospital saline solution still sealed in its original sterile bag, a major paradigm shift is on the way. Surveys already indicate that chemical-based Allopathic medicine is now the "alternative medicine" as far as the American public is concerned. Once the Georgia clinic has run through a few thousand patients and published their results, we may have a medical revolution on our hands.
-
-
Re: The Rife Story
Sat, April 2, 2005 - 4:06 PMAn article by Rife himself circa 1954
Presenting a brief history of the Evolution of the Microscope
by Royal R. Rife
Page 10, THE AEROHRCRAFTER, JANUARY 1954
AS we turn back the pages of time in the history of the evolution of the microscope, we trace it's source back to the gray dawn of our historic morning. In the translation from the ancient Chinese, we find that it was used in the Chow-Foo dynasty more than 2,000 years before our Christian era. These leaned men were credited with the making of the first refractive lens in the history of optics.
As near as we can translate from their records, they used a small tube some three feet in length on a suitable base and stand, with a refractive single lens in the lower end of this tube. And with the ingenious method of filling the tube with different levels of water, they attained different peaks of magnification. As near as we can translate, when the tube was completely filled with water they attained a magnification of some 100 moou, which is about 150 times our standard.
THERE seems to be little or no change in this principal or method over a period of five centuries. And then we loose any data on the microscope whatsoever, until again we pick it up in the time of the ancient Greeks in about 384 B.C., where we find that a type of microscope was used and some of its principles recorded by Aristotle. These devices were more than likely inferior to the ones used by the ancient Chinese. These small spheres of glass were not only used to enlarge small objects, but were also used as burning spheres for the cauterization of the skin lesions of leprosy and allied infections. We derived the word microscope from the compounding of two Greek words, uikpos, small and okottew, view.
The first compound microscope was built by Hans Jasson and his son Zacharias, in Middleburg, Holland, about 1590 and was used to some extent on work with insects, but no record of the work attained is on record.
ANTHONY VON LEEUWENHOEK, justly called the father of microscopy, was born in Delft, Holland, in 1632. Von Leeuwenhoek built all his own microscopes, preferring the single lens to the compound type, which at that date was very lacking in resolution and detail. He described many small living particles in such minute detail that we know them today as bacteria. Many observers possibly may have seen these live entities, but Von Leeuwenhoek was the first to describe them in detail and record his findings, which were embodied in the form of a contribution which was presented to the Royal Society of London in 1883. From the perusal of the tests and the inspection of the plates there remains little doubt that Von Leeuwenhoek with his primitive lens, had observed the bodies now recognized as the cause of disease.
Many improvements were made in the microscope from that time. The major factor being the mechanics of the instrument in its control and adjustments. But improvements in the optical detail were undoubtedly lacking for over 100 years. Hartnic of Paris is accredited with the construction of the first compound objective lens in 1640, which was a decided step forward.
DOLLAND of England developed in 1844, the image lens, which was in almost its initial form to the present day. In 1870, Abbe, the immortal optical wizard of the Carl Zeiss works in Gena, developed and brought out the sub-stage condenser, which still bears his name, and was one of the outstanding contributions to the microscope of all time.
From 1880 to 1885 Carl Zeiss introduced many improvements in the microscope. Among them the appocromat objective lens, which was an outstanding optical achievement at that time.
Thus the microscope has slowly risen out of the dim mist of antiquity to the modern instruments of the present day. The writer has over a period of thirty years has designed and built in his own laboratory 5 microscopes of power and resolution far beyond the so-called law of optical physics. These instrument vary in their power from 17 to 50,000 times above and beyond the limits of the standard research instrument. The commercial microscope being manufactured is inadequate for the observation of filterable viruses of disease (as these minute live, living entities are less than 1/20 of one micron in dimension). Thus the need for a device which would carry us farther into this important field of endeavor. We will describe in some detail the most powerful of these microscopes, known as the universal microscope.
THE universal microscope, which is the largest and most powerful of the light microscopes developed in 1933, consists of 5,682 parts and is so called because of its adaptability in all fields of microscopical work, being fully equipped with separate substage condenser units for transmitted and monochromatic beam, dark-field, polarized, and slit-ultra illumination, including also a special device for crystallography. The entire optical system of lenses and prisms as well as the illuminating units are made of block-crystal quartz, quartz being especially transparent to ultraviolet radiations.
The illuminating unit used for examining the filtrable forms of disease organisms contains 14 lenses and prisms, 3 of which are in the high-intensity incandescent lamp, 4 in the Risely prism, and 7 in the achromatic condenser which, incidentally has a numeric aperture of 1.40. Between the source of light and the specimen are subtended two circular, wedge-shaped, block-crystal quartz prisms for the purpose of polarizing the light passing through the specimen, polarization being the practical application of the theory that light waves vibrate in all planes perpendicular to the direction in which they are propagated. Therefor, when the light comes into contact with a polarizing prism, it is divided or split into the two beams, one of which is refracted to such an extent that it is reflected to the side of the prism without, of course, passing through the prism while the second ray, bent considerably less, is thus enabled to illuminate the specimen.
When the quartz prism on the universal microscope, which may be rotated with a vernier control through 360 degrees, are rotated in opposite directions, they serve to bend the transmitted beams of light at variable angles of incidence while, at the same time, a spectrum is projected up into the axis of the microscope, or rather a small portion of a spectrum since only a small part of a band of color is visible at any one time. However, it is possible to proceed in this way from one end of the spectrum to the other, going all the way from the infrared to the ultraviolet. Now, when a portion of the spectrum is reached in which both the organism and the color band vibrate in exact accord, one with the other, a definite characteristic spectrum is emitted by the organism.
IN the case of the filter-passing form of Bacillus typhosus, for instance, a blue spectrum is emitted and the plane of deviation deviated plus 4.8 degrees. The predominating constituents of the organism are next ascertained after which the quartz prisms are adjusted or set, by means of vernier control to minus 4.8 degrees (again in the case of the filter passing form of the Bacillus typhosus) so that the opposite angle of refraction may be obtained. A monochromatic beam of light, corresponding exactly to the frequency of the organism (for the writer has found that each disease organism responds to and has a definite and distinct wavelength, a fact confirmed by British medical research workers) is then set up through the specimen and the direct transmitted light, thus enabling the observer to view the organism stained in its true chemical color and revealing its own individual structure in a field which is brilliant with light.
THE objectives used on the universal microscope are a 1.12 dry lens, a 1.16 water immersion, a 1.18 oil immersion and a 1.25 oil immersion. The rays of light refracted by the specimen enter the objective and are then carried up the tube in parallel rays through 21 light bends to the ocular, a tolerance of less then one wave length of visible light only being permitted in the core beam, or chief ray, of illumination. Now, instead of the light rays starting up the tube in a parallel fashion, tending to converge as they rise higher and finally crossing each other, arriving at the ocular separated by considerable distance as would be the case with an ordinary microscope, in the universal the rays also start their rise parallel to each other but, just as they are about to cross, a specially designed prism is inserted which serves to pull them out parallel again, another prism inserted each time they are about ready to cross.
These prisms, inserted in the tube, which are adjusted and held in alignment by micrometer screws of 100 threads to the inch in separate tracks made of magnelium (magnelium having the closest coefficient of expansion of any metal to quartz), are separated by a distance of only 30 millimeters. Thus, the greatest distance that the image in the universal is project through any one media, either quartz or air, is 30 millimeters instead of the 160, 180, or 190 millimeters as in the employ or air filled tube of an ordinary microscope, the total distance which the light rays travel zigzag fashion through the universal tube being 449 millimeters, although the physical length of the tube itself is 229 millimeters.
IT will be recalled that if one pierces a black strip of paper or cardboard with the point of a needle and brings the card up close to the eye so that the hole is in the optic axis, a small brilliantly lighted object will appear larger and clearer, revealing more fine detail, than if it were viewed from the same distance without the assistance of the card. This is explained by the fact that the beam of light passing through the card is very narrow, the rays entering the eye, therefore, being practically parallel, whereas without the card the beam of light is much wider and the diffusion circles much larger. It is this principal of parallel rays in the universal microscope and the resultant shortening of the projection distaqnce between any two blocks or prisms plus the fact that objectives can thus be substituted for oculars, these "oculars" being three matched pairs of 10-millimeter, 7-millimeter, and 4-millimeter objectives in short mounts, which make possibe not only the unusually high magnification and resolution but which serve to eliminate all distortion as well as all chromatic and spherical aberration.
Quartz glasses with especially thin quartz cover glasses are used when a tissue section or culture slant is examined, the tissue section its self also being very thin. An additional observational tube and ocular which reveal a magnification of 1,800 diameters are provided so that that portion of the specimen which is desired should be examined may be located and so that the observer may adjust himself more readily when viewing a section at a high magnification.
THE universal stage is a double rotating stage graduated through 360 degrees in quarter-minute arc divisions, the upper segment carrying the mechanical stage having a movement of 40 degrees, the body assembly which can be moved horizontally over the condenser also having and angular tilt of 40 degrees plus or minus. Heavily constructed joints and screw adjustments maintain rigidity of the microscope which weighs 200 pounds and stand 24 inches high, the bases of the scope being nickel cast-steel plates, accurately surfaced, and equipped with three leveling screws and two spirit levels set at angles of 90 degrees. The coarse adjustment, a block thread screw of 40 threads to the inch, slides in a 1 « dovetail which gibs onto the pillar post. The weight of the quadruple nosepiece and the objective system is taken care of by the intermediate adjustment at the top of the body tube. The stage, in conjunction with a hydraulic lift, acts as a lever in operating the fine adjustment. A 6-gauge screw having 100 threads to the inch is worked through a gland in a hollow, glycerine-filled post, the glycerine being displaced and replaced at will as the screw is turned clockwise or anticlockwise, allowing a 5-1 ratio on the lead screw. This accordingly, assures complete absence of drag and inertia. The fine adjustment being 700 times more sensitive than that of ordinary microscope, the length of time required to focus the universal microscope ranges up to 1 « hours which, while on first consideration, may seem a disadvantage, is after all but a slight inconvenience when compared with the many years of research and the hundreds of thousand of dollars spent and being spent in an effort to isolate and to look upon disease-causing organisms in their true form.
We sincerely hope that our efforts in the field of optics, and its allied branches, will stimulate and create a desire in the minds of other workers to carry on in the broad and inviting field before us, one which presents a work so vital and essential for the benefit of all mankind.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR- Dr. Royal R. Rife is presently retained under contract to Rohr Aircraft Corporation for a special assignment. A fellow of the Royal Microscopic Society, he has designed and built his own laboratory, 5 microscopes of power and resolution far beyond the so-called law of optical physics, several of which are pictured here. Doctor Rife holds a Doctor of Philosophy degree from Heidelburg University, and a Doctor of Science degree from the University of Southern California. He resides in Point Loma.
All rights reserved. © 1954 Royal R. Rife
1956
-
-
-
-
Re: The Rife Story
Fri, December 5, 2008 - 12:22 PMAn Interview with Royal Raymond Rife!
Royal Raymond Rife and his engineer John Crane developed a new type of frequency therapy device, in the 50s, using electrodes placed on the body to administer the resonance waves. Just 10 years later, the AMA again struck to silence this form of therapy. In 1960 John Crane's laboratories were raided without a search warrant, years of work were either confiscated or smashed and Crane was taken to trial in spring 1961. Although there was a large amount of evidence supporting the effectivness of the Rife/Crane therapy, this evidence was not permitted to be used in the trial! John Crane was sentenced to 10 years in prison of which he served 3 years and 1 month.
During the preparation for this trial in 1961, the defense lawyer sent a long list of 137 highly interesting questions to Royal Rife, who was in Mexico at the time, on the research he and Crane had done. These questions and answers were also not permitted to be used in defense and ONLY the questions could be found amongt the trial papers as stored in the court house, today. Until very recently the answers to these questions were believed to have been lost. They have only now been found by someone who had the answers, but not the questions. The answers have been dated, 22nd March 1961.
For the first time (as far as I know), these questions and answers are appearing here together on the Internet. It contains some very interesting comments on the work of Royal Rife as he saw it himself and answers many questions only guessed at before. I (Peter Walker) recently received photocopies of these documents and due to the poor state of the copies, I typed in the questions and answers manually as scanning was not practical. Some obvious grammatical and spelling mistakes have been corrected and crossed out words have been omitted (all unreadable, except where noted). Differences between British and American English (e.g. "tumor" instead of "tumour") have been left in the original American form. The answers were originally typed almost entirely in upper case. To improve readability, the normal case has been used instead. Any comments I have added are in square brackets []. Otherwise, the list of questions and answers shown here is complete and nothing has been left out.
Anyone is welcome to link to this page (or preferably my site), but do not simply copy the contents of this page and place it on any other site. The source of this information is known to me by name and is reliable.
Home page
The Background to the John Crane Trial as told by Barry Lynes
Click here to order this book at Amazon.comBy 1960, Crane had written and copyrighted a manual which explained how the Frequency Instrument was to be used in the experimental treatment of various diseases and on different parts of the body. By that year, 90 instruments were distributed for research and verification on notarized contracts. And then the medical authorities struck.
They raided Crane's office, took over $40,000 in machines, frequency instruments, and one large Rife ray tube instrument, along with engineering data, research records and reports, pictures off the wall, private letters, invoices, tape recordings, and electronic parts-all without a search warrant.
They smashed all the research which had been put together over 10 laborious years. As in 1939, they visited the doctors who were experimenting with the machines and forced them to abandon them. They also pressured ordinary citizens who had begun experimenting on a personal basis.
These visits were made by teams of investigators. "One woman was scared so bad that she has been in a sanitarium driven entirely out of her mind. Her husband cursed them out and told them, to get off his property and has threatened to exterminate them should they return. His wife has undergone shock treatments and two months of hospitalization."
The records and materials seized were not allowed to be used by Crane in his own defense during his trial.
Roy Rife, almost 73 and incapable of suffering the abuse of another trial at his age, went into hiding in Mexico. His deposition was not permitted to be introduced at the trial. Neither were the medical and scientific reports from the 1930s and 1940s. Nor were medical reports from Dr. Stafford in Ohio. Dr. Couche's letters were also declared inadmissable. No medical or scientific report which indicated the Frequency Instrument worked as represented was permitted to be introduced at the trial. Crane was left naked with only the patients who had been cured or helped.
The trial was held in early 1961. After 24 days, and despite the testimony of 14 patients who told how the Frequency Instrument cured ailments and diseases which orthodox medicine could not alleviate, Crane was found guilty. The only medical opinion offered by the State of California came from Dr. Paul Shea who had been given a Frequency Instrument by the Public Health Department for 2 months before the trial. Shea admitted he never tried the Frequency Instrument on anything or made any tests to evaluate it. He simply examined it and decided that it had no curative powers and didn't lend itself to investigative use.
Also, and most disturbing, the foreman of the jury was an AMA doctor. Everyone else was carefully screened to see that they had no medical knowledge, no electronic knowledge, and didn't read any newspapers supporting alternative healing. The verdict was a foregone conclusion. Crane was sentenced to 10 years in jail. Following appeals, two of the three counts against Crane were reversed in the California Supreme Court because no specific criminal intent had been proven. But Crane still spent 3 years and 1 month in jail. The cure for cancer had been effectively suppressed again.
During the trial, James Hannibal, age 76, testified. Blind in one eye, he'd been treated by the Frequency Instrument. After several applications, his cataract disappeared-just as cataracts had dissolved in many of Dr. Milbank Johnson's patients during the 1935-37 clinics. Other witnesses at Crane's trial testified to the curing of chronic bladder irritation, and the elimination of a throat lump one-half of the size of an egg. Also cured were fungus growths on hands, fissures in the anus, pyorrhea, arthritis, ulcerated colon, varicose veins, prostrate troubles, tumorous growth over eyes, colitis, pains in the back, and heart attacks. One man testified that for 17 years he had a growth the size of an egg on his spine. After treatment, it had disappeared.
After Crane was imprisoned, so much pressure was put on Dr. Stafford in Ohio that he gave up medicine and became a salesman. Another doctor in Salt Lake City had his Frequency Instrument sabotaged and then was hounded by the orthodox medical authorities to such an extent that he committed suicide. Such were the lengths to which the anti-Rife forces were willing to go in order to prevent the testing and use of this breakthrough technology.
The Questions to and Answers from Royal Raymond Rife in 1960
First page of the questions to Rife First page of the answers from Rife
1.
Please state your name?
Royal Raymond Rife
2.
Where do you reside?
As a tourist in Tijuana [Mexico just over the border from San Diego, CA]
3.
Is it your intention to attend as a witness at the trial of this action?
No
4.
Are you the same Royal R. Rife who invented the system of killing or de-activating pathogenic organisms by electronic waves or frequencies produced by instruments similar to those made by Mr. John Crane, one of the Defendants in this case?
Yes
5.
If so, when did you begin your experimental work on this system?
1915
6.
How long a period did your work cover, in developing the device and the techniques of its use?
From 1920 to the present time - 40 years and development is still continuing.
7.
What is the basic theory upon which you sought to find a means of killing pathogenic organisms?
The theory of coordinative resonance with frequencies which I proved would kill microorganisms by electron transfer and internal stresses of pathogenic cells owing to electromagnetic and electrostatic forces.
8.
What kind of pathogenic organisms did you study, in these experiments?
Tetanus, typhoid, gonorrhea, syphilis, staphylococci, pneumonia, strertothrix, streptococi, tuberculosis, sarcoma, carcinoma, leprosy, polio, cholera, actinomycosis, glanders, bubonic plague, anthrax, influenza, herpes, cataracts, glaucomia, colitis, sinus, ulcers and many other virus bacteria, and fungi.
9.
From what sources were these organisms obtained?
The Hooper Foundation, Paradise Valley Sanatorium, from Northwestern Medical University in Chicago, from the Mayo Clinic, and from many medical doctors.
10.
What sort of laboratory facilities did you have, for use in these experiments?
I had one of the best privately equipped laboratories in the world complete with a million volt X-Ray, frequency instruments, electronic test equipment, precision lathes, mills, drill presses, shaper and all equipment necessary to make instruments, microscopes, glass blowing, and a surgical room for animals with sterilizers of the steam type and a pathology room complete with microscopes of all types virus microscopes which I had designed and built for the isolation of cancer virus, T.B. virus, typhoid virus and many other virus. I had a stop motion microscope set up for the life study of microorganisms from the cradle to the grave. I had animals in cages in the basement with facilities for 1000 animals. The Rife Research Laboratory was air-conditioned and humidity controlled to one tenth of one degree.
11.
Where was your laboratory located?
On Alcott Street across the bridges mansion in Point Loma
12.
Did you study viruses, among other pathogenic organisms?
Yes.
13.
Were any special instruments required for your study of viruses?
Yes.
14.
What were they?
Prismatic virus microscopes and Berkefelt porcelain filters, a micromanipulator and electronic test instruments and frequency instruments.
15.
Were all of these obtained from ordinary commercial sources?
No - I could not buy them on the open market and they are still not obtainable even today.
16.
If some were not obtainable from ordinary commercial sources, how did you obtain them?
I had to design and build these instruments to accomplish what I wanted to attain with my research.
17.
Who designed these?
I designed them.
18.
Where were they made?
In the Rife Research Laboratory
19.
Describe these special instruments for us?
The universal microscope was described and published by the journal of the Franklin Institute. Time does not permit me to describe all of the many instruments that I designed and constructed. The micromanipultor was used to dissect and operate on cells. The spectrometer was used to measure the angle of crystals, the frequency instruments were used to kill bacteria, virus, and fungi, the microscopes of the prismatic virus were used to study living virus, bacteria, and fungi, a petrographical micropolariscope was used to analyze chemicals and color frequencies with polarized light, special rare gas glass contained atmospheres were used to provide ionized radiation to transmit energy to increase virulence and to devitalize all microorganisms as desired.
20.
Which pathogenic organisms did you study in virus form?
Cancer virus, typhoid, tuberculosis virus, herpes virus, B-coli virus, poliomyelitis virus, and about 40 other viruses that have never been isolated before.
21.
How did you obtain these viruses?
From pure cultures of known and medical diagnosed tissues of human disease filtered through porcelain Berkefeld filters.
22.
Describe your experiments by which you isolated these viruses?
After the filtered form was obtained, a micropipette is used to place a drop of the fluid on a slide. This slide is placed on the microscope stage of any of the 5 virus microscopes that I designed and built. A special Bisely prism which works on a counter rotation principle selects a portion of the light frequency which illuminates these virus in their own characteristic chemical colors by emission of coordinative light frequency and the virus become readily identifiable by the colors revealed on observation. 8000 to 17000x magnification is sufficient to see them. Before building the virus prismatic microscopes, I sectioned over 15,000 slides trying all types of acid and aniline dye strains with no results over a period of 10 years.
23.
How did you determine whether these viruses were pathogenic?
By animal tests and from known sources and by microscope examination which reveals the true identity of microorganisms to the trained observer.
24.
Describe your experiments made to prove that these viruses were pathogenic?
On one series of cancer tests, I inoculated the virus which I had isolated and filtered from an unulcerated breast mass into an Albino rat, the tumor was allowed to grow and then I surgically removed the tumor and again isolated and filtered the virus from a portion of the ground up tumor and inoculated the next rat and repeated this procedure 411 times to prove that this virus was the causative agent of cancer. Tests on many other diseases such as those previously mentioned are too numerous to even start on at this time.
25.
About how long a period of time did your work/study of these viruses, and proof of their pathogenic character, cover?
15 years on virus only
26.
Did you also study bacterial forms of pathogenic organisms associated with these viruses?
Yes.
27.
Did you find whether some bacteria were capable of releasing a form of virus?
Yes. Virus are released from bacteria just as a chicken lays an egg.
28.
How did you determine this?
By virus observation and cell study and virus photographs which I made and one which John Crane made from a film of cancer virus which has been copyrighted.
29.
What are some of the bacteria which you found to be capable of releasing a form of virus?
Bacillus coli, tuberculosis, typhoid, and many others.
30.
Were certain kinds of culture media better suited than others to the study of the relationship between the bacteria and virus forms?
A media developed by Arthur I. Kendall known as "K" media proved superior to other types of bacteria media
31.
If so, why, or in what way, were some culture media superior to others for this purpose?
Because of the results obtained
32.
Were any physicians or scientists associated with you in any of these studies?
Yes
33.
Who were they?
Milbank Johnson, M.D., Arthur I. Kendall, Ph.D., E.C. Rosenow, M.D., Coolidge of General Electric, O.C. Grunner, M.D., Henry Siner, Dr. Copp, M.D., Alvin G. Foord, M.D., Ernest Lynwood Walker, M.D., and Karl Meyer, M.D., of the Hooper Foundation of San Francisco, George Dock, M.D.,Waylen Morrison, M.D., Dr. Fischer, M.D., Verne Thompson, Ben Cullen, Ray Lounsberry, M.D., James B. Couche, M.D., Charles F. Tully, D.D.S., Arthur Yale, M.D., R.T. Hamer, M.D., John Crane, Dave Sawyer, Don Tully, J. Heitger, M.D., Royal Lee, Ph.D., T.O. Burger, M.D., Alice Kendall and many others.
34.
Where did they work with you?
Work was conducted in various laboratories, offices, and buildings in San Diego and in the United States. I traveled all over the world and many doctors and scientists and executives visited me at my various laboratories including the Rife Research Laboratory, The Point Loma Lab set up at Dr. Tully's, The Rife Virus Microscope Institute, and another microscope and dark room facility at San Diego, and I furnished free of charge to the police crime laboratory thousands of dollars worth of chemicals, precision instruments, electronic instruments, and training in microscope techniques and laboratory diagnosis and other equipment and glassware after I closed the Rife Research Laboratory in 1946. Another laboratory for research work on seawater conversion was set up and used at the foot of Canyon Street in Point Loma.
35.
What part did they have in any of these experiments or studies?
Initially the work and the origin was developed under my control and guidance. Later their work became an interest of collaboration and observation of the results attained. Initially I worked with loose couplers to get an audio oscillation and then with the use of transmitters, I tried to balance the audio and modulate the audio on a carrier wave to transmit the audio energy but I found that both the audio and the audio transmitted through a tube as an antenna worked equally as well in a painless and harmless method to human tissue. Coolidge furnished many tubes. Milbank Johnson, a multimillionaire, set up and supervised three human research clinics. The first clinic was set up under a special medical research committee of the University of Southern California with Dr. Rufus B. von Klein Smidt on the committee in the home of Ellen Scripps in La Jolla in 1934. Johnson selected outstanding doctors to aid us in the clinical work such as Docks, Morrison, Foord, Meyer, Kendall, Rosenow, Fischer of the Children's Hospital in New York, and others helping or observing were Heitger, Lounsberry, Copp, Alice Kendall, Henry Seiner, Grunner, Burger, Hamer, Couche, Yale, and Cullen. Walker and I studied leprosy and I isolated a virus which we jointly demonstrated was common to rat, soil, and human leprosy and I found a frequency which would eliminate leprosy. Dr. Gonin M.D. visited me and I sent Henry Siner to demonstrate a virus microscope in England to the medical profession there. Alice Kendall worked for me in the lab and so did Henry Seiner and others. From 1950 and on, John Crane has continued on with this research. The others were visitors and interested parties. Many others have aided in promotion of this research and the AMA has suppressed all effort and research knowledge of my developments.
36.
Did you grow bacteria and viruses in various culture media?
Yes
37.
How did you determine what they were?
They can readily be diagnosed by their own true colors which are emitted when placed in any of the five virus microscopes that I designed and built for this virus identification and study.
38.
What study and experience did you have in the science of optics, before commencing these experiments?
I studied for 6 years with Hans Luckel who was Carl Zeiss's optical scientist and researcher. I also made all the photomicrographs for the Atlas of Parasites which was done at the University of Heidelberg. I also studied eye surgery for two years
39.
Over about what period of time had you made such study and gained this experience?
Nine years before commencing on my own research.
40.
Did you find ordinary microscopes, such as are obtainable from commercial sources, adequate for the study of these viruses?
No
41.
In what ways were they deficient?
They have insufficient power, poor detail and definition, and poor resolution and cannot illuminate the virus with selective frequency or frequencies of monochromatic beam light which is required to see virus control of the light is very important.
42.
What types of microscope did you find necessary to complete your study of these viruses?
Prismatic virus microscopes which I designed and built for virus study and research only. I have never tried to commercialize on these instruments. They were offered to Baush and Lomb but they couldn't justify the cost of tooling to build these complex instruments and the doctors could not afford to buy them either because they would have been too expensive for the average laboratory to even consider.
43.
In what ways did they differ from the commercially available types?
In the barrel were prisms which transmitted the light. The stage had to be leveled and a series of condenser lenses between the patented microscope lamp of mine and the Risely prism were located below the stage. Special lens spacings were important to compensate for the extra long tube length of 220 and 440 mm and a higher degree of accuracy in stage adjustments was provided. In the Universal Microscope, 7 turns of the dial moved the object under study one micron. Slit ultra illumination was also provided.
44.
Did you obtain the kinds of special microscopes you found to be necessary?
Yes
45.
How did you obtain them?
I built many and I purchased some and had them built to my specifications
46.
What types were they?
Standard research types, prismatic virus types, crystallographic, petrographical-micropolariscope, polarized, and historical types.
47.
What did these special microscopes do which the commercially available types would not do as well?
Show virus and allow us to study them alive and identify them as virus and allow us to diagnose them as to the disease of which they caused and were associated.
48.
What is necessary, in order to make bacteria and viruses visible under the microscope?
First there must be high enough power to enable the observer to see them and second they must be identified by a frequency of light which coordinates with the chemical constituents of the virus or filterable form in question. To my knowledge there is only one instrument today which will even show these virus and that is the Rife prismatic virus microscopes which I built for this work. The electron microscope is a useless device for this study because the virus are killed instantly and you don't know what form you are seeing them in and generally appear as round balls of dried up chemical particles.
Rife 3, The Universal MicroscopeRife 5, sold to Dr. Gonin
49.
What different methods of staining bacteria and viruses are in common use?
Acid and analine dye strains of many formulae are commercially available.
50.
Did you find these common methods of staining sufficient for the experiments you performed?
No
51.
If not, what were their deficiencies?
They would not show the flagella, or the virus.
52.
Did you devise another method of staining or making visible bacteria and viruses?
Yes
53.
What was this method?
I had devised a stain with Alfalfa hay and mercury for flagella on B-Coli and typhoid to count their concentration. Virus were made visible for the first time with a variable light frequency controlled by a Risely prism of a counter-rotating nature, an iris diaphragm, condenser lenses and other features previously mentioned.
54.
Explain how it was done?
By rotation and variable monochromatic beam adjustment of the Rife prismatic virus microscopes.
55.
How did you obtain the instruments necessary to do this?
I built them in my research laboratory. Which is shown in movies that John Crane has at RVMI
56.
What study and experience have you had in the science of Bacteriology?
I studied bacteriology at John Hopkins University and the University of Heidelberg and in my own research laboratory.
57.
Over about what period of time did you get this study and experience?
40 years
58.
Besides studying bacteria and viruses growing in culture media, did you also make any study of their effects upon laboratory animals inoculated with such bacteria or viruses?
Yes
59.
What kinds of animal were used in such experiments?
Albino rats, Guina pigs, rabbits. I had about 800 rats which were used constantly.
60.
Where were such experiments performed?
In the Rife Research Laboratory in Point Loma
61.
Under whose direction?
Under my direction
62.
Did any other scientists or physicians assist you in any of these studies of inoculated laboratory animals?
No, but I had men that worked for me and helped me.
63.
Did any other scientists observe, without actually assisting, any of these studies or experiments?
Yes. Dr. Kendall, Grunner, Johnson, Couche, Copp, Lounsberry, Burger, Seiner, Cullen, Foord, Rosenow, Karl Meyer, Walker, and others as stated before.
64.
Who were they?
[no answer given]
65.
What part did they take in such studies?
By bringing cancer tissue, collaborating results, by using the virus microscopes and observing my results and observations, by growing virus and by conducting clinical tests on virus, bacteria and fungi on cultures and human cases or patients for their own research and knowledge.
66.
As a result of such studies, did you and Dr. Arthur I. Kendall publish a report of some of your experiments or studies of filterable forms of Bacillus Typhosus?
Yes
67.
Was this report published in "California and Western Medicine", the journal of the California Medical Association, in the December, 1931, issue?
Yes
68.
Is this a copy of the article ? (Attach as Defendant's Exhibit A)
Yes
[Click here to read the article or click on "Next" at the bottom of the page]
69.
Was this Dr. Arthur Isaac Kendall, Ph. D., at that time the Director of Medical Research of Northwestern University Medical School?
Yes
70.
In July, 1932, did you continue some of this study of bacteria and viruses with Dr. Isaac Kendall in his laboratory at Northwestern University Medical School?
Yes
71.
At that time, did Dr. E. C. Rosenow, M.D., of the Division of Experimental Bacteriology of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, observe some of this study made at Northwestern University Medical School, in Dr. Kendall's laboratory?
Yes
72.
Did Dr. Rosenow publish a report of this study in the July 1932 issue of the Mayo Clinic bulletin?
Yes
73.
Is this a copy of this publication of Dr. Rosenow's article (Attach as Defendant's Exhibit B)
Yes.
[Click here to read this report] (courtesy of Stanley Truman of www.rife.org)
74.
About when did you begin your experiments in the effect of electronic frequencies upon bacteria and viruses?
1920
75.
How did you obtain the device or mechanism used to generate such frequencies?
Some coils I wound myself. Other parts I purchased.
76.
How did you determine whether particular frequencies had any affect upon bacteria or viruses?
By observation with bacteria and virus under the Rife virus prismatic microscopes in conjunction with the application of electronic energy.
77.
Were you able to kill or de-activate any bacteria or viruses by the application to them of electronic currents or rays?
Yes
78.
Can you name some of the bacteria and viruses which you were able to kill or de-activate by such means?
Tetanus, typhoid, gonorrhea, treponema pallidum, staphylococci, pneumonia, streptothrix, bacillus coli, tuberculosis, streptococci, sarcoma, carcinoma, and many others. It was found that by using combinations of these frequencies for the different microorganisms that many other disease could be helped like sinus, ulcers, cataract, arthritis, poliomyelitis, etc.
79.
Is there a distinction between the terms "kill" and "de-activate" as you have used them? That is to say, were any of these viruses or bacteria deprived of their virulent activity without having to completely kill them?
Yes. On some research it was found that after transfer to another media no further reproduction would occur.
80.
After treatment of viruses or bacteria by the application to them of certain electronic currents or rays, as you have mentioned, was there ever any change in the appearance of such bacteria or viruses as seen under your microscope? If so, describe it.
Yes. Some types will explode or disintegrate and some will gather together like log jams or agluetinate.
81.
Were you acquainted with Dr. Milbank Johnson, M. D., during this period?
Yes
82.
Did he participate in any of your experiments or studies on the effect of electronic frequencies upon bacteria and viruses?
Yes
83.
Did he participate in any of your experiments or studies on the effect of these electronic frequencies upon laboratory animals which had been inoculated with various diseases?
Yes
84.
Did you furnish one of your electronic frequency-generators to Dr. Milbank Johnson for his use?
Yes
85.
Over about what period of time did he use it?
8 years
86.
Where did he make use of it?
In the Santa Fe hospital in Los Angeles and a private clinic in Pasadena.
87.
Was this electronic frequency-generator used by him or under his direction in the treatment of diseases of human patients?
Yes
88.
Did he report to you the result of these treatments?
Yes
89.
Did you observe the giving of any of these treatments?
Yes
90.
Did you observe the results of these treatments?
Yes
91.
What changes did you observe in the condition of any of the patients so treated by Dr. Milbank Johnson with the instrument you had furnished to him? Describe them in detail?
I observed some cataract cases, etc.
92.
During the period of time when Dr. Milbank Johnson was so using your electronic frequency-generator, were you acquainted with Dr. James B. Couche M. D. (now deceased)?
Yes
93.
Did Dr. James B. Couche participate in the work of Dr. Milbank Johnson in the treatment of human patients with the frequency-generator?
Yes
94.
Did you furnish Dr. James B. Couche, M. D., with one of your electronic frequency-generators for his own use?
Yes. The beam Ray Corporation built two instruments for Dr. Couche
95.
When did Dr. Milbank Johnson die?
1942
96.
Was the work of Dr. Milbank Johnson in treating human patients with your frequency-generator continued after his death?
Yes
97.
Did Dr. James B. Couche continue to use the frequency-generator which you had furnished to him? If so, until about what date?
Yes. Until he died in 1959
98.
About when did Dr. James B. Couche die?
In the spring of 1959
99.
Did Dr. James B. Couche report to you the results of his use of your electronic frequency-generator?
Yes
100.
Did you observe any of the treatments given by Dr. James B. Couche with your electronic frequency-generator?
Yes
101.
Did you observe the results of any of the treatments given by Dr. James B. Couche with your electronic frequency-generator?
Yes
102.
What changes did you observe in the condition of any of the human patients who had been so treated with your frequency-generator by Dr. James B. Couche?
I saw cancer and tuberculosis cases that had completely recovered. I saw Dr. Couches brother who had come over from England. He had a 30 year sinus condition with terrible drainage. Dr. Couche used the frequency instrument on him and he was well in three weeks. Dr. Couche had treated Dr. Hamer, M.D. for a sinus condition which cleared up. Dr. Couche had treated Dr. Butterfield, M.D's brother-in-law who had a stiff wrist * a tuberculosis of the bone which cleared up. Also I saw a mexican boy who had osteomelitys of the bone which Dr. Couche cleared up with the frequency instrument. I saw George Lemm being treated by Dr. Couche for tuberculosis and he had come out from Chicago to die. He was sent from the Vulclain home. As soon as they found out that Couche was getting results, they tried to get all of their patients back but Lemm said no that he was going to finish up with Couche and he completely recovered.
103.
Did you furnish Dr. Arthur W. Yale, M. D. (now deceased) with one of your electronic frequency-generators? If so, about when?
Yes. He ordered an instrument from the Beam Ray Corporation in 1937
104.
Did Dr. Arthur W. Yale furnish you with any reports of the results of his treatment of human patients with your electronic frequency-generator device?
Yes
105.
Did you observe the results of any of the treatments given by Dr. Arthur W. Yale?
Yes
106.
Did you observe the condition of any of Dr. Arthur W. Yale's patients after they had been treated by him with your electronic frequency-generator? If so, what change, if any, in their condition did you observe?
Yes. They completely recovered from syphilis, cancer, tuberculosis, and many other infections
107.
Did you perform any experiments on laboratory animals which had been inoculated with any diseases, to determine the affect upon such animals of treatment with your electronic frequency-generator?
Yes
108.
What kind of animals did you use?
Albino rats, rabbits, Guina pigs
109.
With what diseases were these animals inoculated?
Sarcoma, carcinoma, tuberculosis, typhoid, etc.
110.
Were any of these animals inoculated with cancer in any form?
Yes
111.
Describe in detail the experiments with your electronic frequency-generator?
Before the animal was inoculated a quarantine period of two weeks was observed with stool analysis and metabolism check up made to be sure that the animal was free of disease and in good health. On one series of cancer tests I inoculated the cancer virus that I isolated from an unulcerated human breast mass into an Albino rat and grew the tumor. I surgically removed this tumor and again isolated the virus and inoculated the next rat. I did this 411 times on one series of tests to prove that the BX or the virus which I had isolated was in reality the causative agent of cancer. This procedure is shown in a documentary film which John Crane has of this work and it also shows the virus of cancer before and after devitalization with a Rife frequency instrument. An air bubble is shown coming into the cover slip because I had not sealed it. We also did a great deal of work on tuberculosis with animals and proved that the rod form and the virus form must both be devitalized to attain results which requires two frequencies * One for each form before recovery can occur. The treatment for all of the diseases proved successful and hundreds of tests were conducted on each disease with adequate controls before the critical frequencies were established.
112.
Did you compare the subsequent condition of the animals so treated with your frequency-generator with the condition of "control" animals which had been inoculated with disease but not treated with your frequency-generator? If so, describe the difference, if any, which you observed in their condition.
Yes. The inoculated controls died and the controls which were not inoculated were not affected.
113.
About how many experiments of this kind did you make?
50,000 [note: on the original document 100,000 had been type-written, crossed out and 50,000 added by hand] animal tests and 400 [15,000 type-written, crossed out and 400 written by hand] test tubes daily on my experiments.
114.
Over about what period of time did you conduct these experiments?
26 years
115.
Did you find, from these experiments, that it made any difference which particular frequency you used in the treatment of any certain disease?
Yes
116.
Did any disease respond exactly the same to all frequencies or a wide variety of frequencies? If so, which one?
No
117.
Were you able to determine whether each kind of bacteria or virus which you tested was affected most by some particular frequency?
Yes
118.
What happened when you used a different frequency on it?
It was not affected
119.
Did you make a moving picture showing the interior of your laboratory and some of its equipment?
Yes
120.
Did this moving picture also show some of your experimental work on laboratory animals?
Yes. Some cancer work is shown.
121.
In this moving picture, who is the person shown performing surgical operations on laboratory animals?
I performed all surgery at the Rife Research Laboratory.
122.
Who now has this moving picture? Did you give it to him?
John Crane. Yes
[Click here to see the Rife Lab Video narrated by John Crane] (courtesy of Stanley Truman of www.rife.org)
You will need RealPlayer to view this Video.
123.
Did you ever explain to John F. Crane, one of the defendants in this case, the principles upon which your electronic frequency-generator is used in the treatment of diseases?
Yes in 1950
124.
Did you also inform him of the particular frequencies which you had found to be effective in the treatment of various diseases?
Yes. Verne Thompson and I gave the frequencies to John Crane.
125.
When did you furnish him with this information?
In 1950
126.
Did you ever request any governmental department or agency to make a test of your electronic frequency-generator to determine its effect upon diseases? If so, which one or ones?
Yes. The Department of Health, Education and Welfare and the National Research Council * Committee on Growth * Washington D.C., The American Cancer Society, The Damon Runyon Fund, The Slone Kettering Institute, The International Cancer Clinic and many others. They have shown no interest in an electronic method.
127.
Did any one of them express willingness to make such a test, or even to observe such a test? Is so, which one?
Yes. The American Cancer Society was interested until they found out that John Crane and I are not medical doctors and then they called John Crane from New York and stated that they had decided to cancel the proposed project which would have shown them how to isolate the virus, make it virulent, grow the cancer tumors and how to electronically eliminate the cancer. They spend millions on drugs but nothing on electronics unless it will supplement drugs like X-Ray and radioactive treatments which put terrible scar tissue and burns inside the body and then the person has to have a great amount of dope and pain killers to keep the pain down. The drug racketeer makes ten billion dollars annually on cancer alone and with this money they have been able to have an unconstitutional law put on the books which stated that people will only be treated for cancer by medical doctors with X-Ray, radioactive treatments, and surgery creating a drug monopoly to kill cancer; slowly.
128.
Did any one of them ever actually make a test of your electronic frequency-generator, using the frequencies which you had found to be effective, so far as you know?
No
129.
Did you ever request any medical school to make a test of your electronic frequency-generator, using the frequencies which you had found to be effective?
Yes
130.
Other than the work of the Special Committee under Dr. Milbank Johnson, did any medical school express a willingness to make such a test?
Yes. Work was done at the Hooper Foundation of the University of California and at Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago by Ernest Lynwood Walker and Arthur I. Kendall
131.
Did you ever request any medical society to make a test of your electronic frequency-generator, using the frequencies which you had found to be effective? If so, which one or ones?
Yes. The American Medical Association
132.
Did any medical society express a willingness to make, or to observe such a test?
No
133.
So far as you know, has any medical society ever made a test of your electronic frequency-generator, using the frequencies which you had found to be effective?
No
134.
Have you ever made or observed a test of the effect of the electronic frequency-generators, of the type produced by John F. Crane, one of the Defendants in this case? If so, tell us the kind of test or tests, who made such a test or tests, and what result you observed.
Yes. I saw the instrument kill earthworms., bacillus coli and others. I showed John Crane how to accomplish this work. [note: the text starting with "bacillus coli..." was obviously added later using a different type-writer]
135.
Have you been awarded a Research Fellowship in Bio-Chemistry by any nationally-known Institute for Scientific Research?
Yes
136.
What is the name of it?
Andean Anthropological Expedition
137.
Is this a copy of the award, together with a copy of the covering letter or transmittal from the Andean Anthropological Expedition? (Attach as Defendant's Exhibit C).
Yes
-
